Tuesday, December 31, 2019

A Comparison Between the Plots of King Lear and Much Ado...

It is no revolutionary statement to say that William Shakespeare wrote some of the greatest plays of all time. This is accepted by everyone from high schoolers to experts as fact. But everyone is always wondering, what makes them great? Well, at the heart of every great Shakespeare play is a well written plot. But how can one man churn out all these plays he’s written, and still have new content in each one? Aren’t they all the same story to some extent? As Lindsay Smith writes, â€Å"Many Shakespeare plays, like most typical Renaissance plays, are divided into scenes and acts. There are five acts and anywhere from three to five scenes per act.† So his plays can’t be all that different, right? This statement will be examined after taking a†¦show more content†¦From here he begins to court her, hoping to marry her. Now in comparison, these plays are similar in rising action in that both start out with a but a ripple of what is to come. But, they ar e vastly different in the directions they take; Claudio has some difficulty in reaching his goal, but attains it. But for everyone involved with King Lear, thing go downhill real fast. Also, there are both similarities and differences in King Lear’s and Much Ado about Nothing’s plots in the climax. In both cases, the bad guys ruin everything that was going well to begin with. In Much Ado, the climax happens the night before the wedding, as Kristen Zomparelli will briefly detail. â€Å"The conflict of the play fully illustrates the detrimental flaws in the ruling system. â€Å"A trick by the devious Don John to cross this marriage convinces Leonato, Don Pedro, and Claudio that Hero is unfaithful. Completely fooled by the deception, the men engage in slander against Heros reputation, which in reality is completely virtuous. Despite the fact that Hero fulfills the image of the ideal woman, she is still subject to slanderous ruin by the patriarchy.† This is a very shocking scene to watch. In King Lear, the climax happens after the events of the play have drawn the two plots together, and Cordelia and Lear are together again, held captive by Edmund. He mentions earlier in the play that he would kill them when he captured them, so this

Monday, December 23, 2019

Learning Science and Christianity in Christs College...

Founded 1437 as God’s House by William Byngham. Refounded as Christ’s by Lady Margaret Beaufort in 1505. Named after Jesus. Sister College – Wadham College Oxford. Men and Women – Undergraduates 420 Postgraduates 170 Christ’s College can trace its ancient roots back before the (more or less) official foundation in 1505. At first the establishment was known as God’s House, founded in 1437 by William Byngham, a London priest, with the intention of training grammar school masters. Henry VI requested this desirable riverside site for his own King’s College project, and moved God’s House north, to an agreeable location with a favour owed. Lady Margaret takes an interest So, in 1448 God’s House moved to the current site in the very centre of Cambridge and caught the interest of Henry’s wife, Lady Margaret Beaufort. Following her husband’s death and the crowning of her son Henry VII, Lady Margaret looked around for good causes and found one in God’s House. With focused energy and a word in the ear of her son the institution was re-established as Christ’s College in 1505 with, what was in effect, its third Royal Charter. The institution started life as a Catholic chantry and displayed a keen sense of survival and political awareness to negotiate Henry VIII’s rage with the pope, and the subsequent Dissolution (1536-41). By Elizabethan times Christ’s had become one of the hardcore Puritan colleges of Cambridge. In 1625 John Milton was admitted as a member – he was later destined

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Legal Compliance in the Distribution of Software Applications Free Essays

Software piracy is a rising problem not only in the United States, but around the world. In 1993 worldwide software piracy cost 12. 5 billion dollars to the software industry, with a loss of 2. We will write a custom essay sample on Legal Compliance in the Distribution of Software Applications or any similar topic only for you Order Now 2 billion dollars in the United States alone. Estimates show that over 40 percent of U. S. software company revenues are generated overseas, yet nearly 85 percent of the software industry’s piracy losses occurred outside of the United States borders. The Software Publishers Association indicated that approximately 35 percent of the business software in the United States were obtained illegally, which 30 percent of the piracy occurs in corporate settings. In a corporate setting or business, every computer must have its own set of original software and the appropriate number of manuals. It is illegal for a corporation or business to purchase a single set of original software and than load that software onto more than one computer, or lend, copy or distribute software for any reason without the prior written consent of the software manufacturer. Many software managers are concerned with the legal compliance, along with asset management and costs at their organizations. Many firms involve their legal departments and human resources in regards to software distribution and licensing. In 1974, Congress created the Natural Commission on New Technological Uses (CONTU) to investigate whether the evolving computer technology field outpaced the existing copyright laws and also to determine the extent of copyright protection for computer programs. CONTU concluded that while copyright protection should extend beyond the literal source code of a computer program, evolving case law should determine the extent of protection. The commission also felt that copyright was the best alternative among existing intellectual property protective mechanisms, and CONTU rejected trade secret and patents as viable protective mechanisms. The CONTU report resulted in the 1980 Computer Software Act, and the report acts as informal legislative history to aid the courts in interpreting the Act. In 1980 The Copyright Act was amended to explicitly include computer programs. Title 17 to the United States Code states that it is illegal to make or to distribute copies of copyrighted material without authorization, except for the users right to make a single backup copy for archival purposes. Any written material (including computer programs) fixed in a tangible form is considered copyrighted without any additional action on the part of the author. Therefore, it is not necessary that a copy of the software program be deposited with the Copyright Office in Washington, D. C. for the program to be protected as copyrighted. With that in mind then a copyright is a property right only. In order to prevent anyone from selling your software programs, you must ask a federal court to stop that person by an injunction and to give you damages for the injury they have done to you by selling the program. How to cite Legal Compliance in the Distribution of Software Applications, Essay examples

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Paper on Cheating Essay Example For Students

Paper on Cheating Essay It seems like everyone is always looking for an easy way out of everything. Its hard to handle school when you have other difficulties in your life. With work, family, and friends it seems like nothing can ever be completed on time. Its no wonder that in a recent reading from John Hickman in Cybercheats students are turning more and more to online plagiarism then they were years ago. When times get rough and tough it seems like most students do turn to the internet for a little extra help. In Cybercheats it clearly shows how students use certain websites to get free or even pay for important papers and essays. As technology gets more advanced it appears that some people actually get lazier. Plagiarism plays a very important and major part in this article. It is clear that if caught plagiarizing you can be suspended, expelled, and/or receive an F on your assignment. For most students though it is worth the risk. Plagiarism is an act of cheating. Plagiarism is cheating. The article Cybercheats clearly shows the cause/use of plagiarism. Students of all ethnic backgrounds use plagiarism. However it also shows how most schools are trying to crack down. Two employees from National Institutes of Health actually have a program that can decode essays that may have some sort of plagiarism. It is clearly obvious that the students who do indeed use this from of cheating have no real values. As Michael Miller, a teacher at Georgetown University, says, Its really up to the individual reader to do with the information what they will, good or evil. I belong to a school that says teach people to do the right thing and then turnem loose. It seems that if you are adult enough to actually attend collage then you are adult enough to handle the pressures and responsibilities that come along with it. For most cases the use of plagiarism is clearly used by students who dont know the value/capabilities of there own. They also arent usually aware of the consequences. A major fallacy in this reading is Slippery Slope. As a Princeton freshman states, its just so easy, and the class was a waste of time, anyway. Well maybe it is, maybe it isnt. Some students might think the class is difficult. It might even be an important class to them. The use of Slippery Slope shows a person making a judgement without support. The only possible solution to this problem that I can see is the solutions that we are using today. At El Camino I would never think of plagiarizing off of the Internet because of the software program that are available today. El Camino actually has a company that they pay to check essays that they think may be plagiarized. This is a valuable solution because e if you are aware of the consequences of being caught then you wont have the initiative. Using good judgement and putting school, as a priority is a major way to beat the cheat. Bibliography: Works Cited Hickman, John N. New Republic, 03/23/98, Vol. 218 Issue 12, p14, 2p. .